Hello!
This patch is a no-brainer:
develoeprs -> developers
WRT to -> concerning (better ideas? I don't like such abbreviations)
(tm?) - deleted (it's not a trademark, is it?)
defintion -> definition
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
=== cut here ===
Index: future.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/hungry/lesstif/doc/www.lesstif.org/future.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 future.html
--- future.html 2000/05/15 15:35:49 1.1
+++ future.html 2000/05/15 16:53:47
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
The following is a (preliminary) statement of the current
-LessTif develoeprs (core team) WRT to the recent move
+LessTif developers (core team) concerning the recent move
of the OpenGroup to release the source of their Motif
implementation:
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
The LessTif core team is currently considering how to proceed with
the LessTif project now that the sources of Motif are available.
Usage of the OpenGroup's implementation doesn't match the
-OpenSource (tm?) defintion nor a more general definition of 'free'
+OpenSource definition nor a more general definition of 'free'
usage, it's in fact rather limited.
<P>
In this situation there's still need for LessTif at least to have
=== cut here ===
