But it's not exactly a resource offset once compiled, right?? After all, we are looking for a (int)Cardinal < 0, which means a Cardinal > 2147483647 (assuming 4 byte int's and Cardinal's). On 05-Jul-00 at 16:40, Mitch Miers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Ewww. Something screwed the pooch. That's a ridiculous resource > offset (base + 1 gig, more or less). Is this in the super or sub? > I'd check the value before it compiled. I doubt it's a > signed/unsigned issue, its off by too much. > > Mitch > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rick Scott > > Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 1:34 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Hungry CVS: amai : hungry/lesstif/lib/Xm-2.0[...] > > > > > > > > > > > Seriously though, the function shouldn't fail unless the conditional > > > > fails. If the conditional is failing, perhaps it should be > instead > > > > of >= ? Is the problem child at offset zero? > > > > > > Er. Nevermind. Offset zero is legal. What value does the > > > conditional fail on? > > > > 1074926464 > > > > > > > > Mitch > > > > > > > > > >
