On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 16:51:34 -0400, cat2 wrote:
>Both of your reasons are valid. But I suspect the overwhelming reason is, that they
>are _HUGE_. Most
>of us pay for our connections out of our own pockets, or at least want to use our
>phone, instead of many
>hours uploading a binary. As it is, it takes the better part of a hour to build a
>release, for each of the,
>libc5, libc6, and rpm's. This is not even "pensionable" time. Anyway, I'm surprized
>I've managed to
>type this much on this teeny weenie keybord of the wireless. Hope I don't blow my
>charater limit
>sending this.....
Well, actually LessTif libs incorporate new patches every day ... hmm let's say week,
so a static LessTif lib isn't a good idea.
Unlike official Motif releases, which were much more "static".
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
