On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 12:15:17 -0400, cat2 wrote:
>My vote is to ignore.
>
>I don't realy like the copy option anyway. By using copy, when you update autoconf,
>you do not get the
>updated copy of these files in the dist. However, the RPM's were rolling up the
>links, instead of the files.
>consider this a bug in rpm, or we don't have the spec file options correct.
Yup.
Actually the error will be seen in only very rare occasions.
But for a minimum of consistency checks we will keep the same CVSMake for the
few developers and that being used for building the releases.
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]