On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 12:15:17 -0400, cat2 wrote:

>My vote is to ignore.
>
>I don't realy like the copy option anyway. By using copy, when you update autoconf, 
>you do not get the 
>updated copy of these files in the dist. However, the RPM's were rolling up the 
>links, instead of the files. 
>consider this a bug in rpm, or we don't have the spec file options correct.

Yup.
Actually the error will be seen in only very rare occasions.
But for a minimum of consistency checks we will keep the same CVSMake for the
few developers and that being used for building the releases.


---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to