On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 08:38:13AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> That's basically what I came up with also. But why did the tmp++ stop working??
> I feel I'm overlooking something very obvious here....
>
'Stopped working' is not the right expression here ...
I 'fixed' a problem within this code some time ago.
While fixing the problem with external/buildtime linkage of the
classpointers I probably didn't change the pointer business correctly,
if at all :-[
Incrementing tmp++ in fact should have resulted in a crash beyond the
very first entry - I wonder why it came up with form w/o dumping core
(this must be by chance?!)
While thinking about it I should better have done it using a
WidgetClass **tmp;
(which in turn might help to explain what was wrong previously)
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
