I just tried panedw/test9, I show no problems.
On 06-Nov-00 at 16:17, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Just tried to look for the '80 Byte' leak per PanedW creation/deletions
> I can see for test/Xm/panedw/test9
> It turned out that there is no simple '80 Byte' leak, but there
> is a more complex dependency ...
> At least on one machine (this is all on alpha/linux/gcc) I got not even
> the curve one might expect:
>
> leak(number) = constant_class + constant_widget * number
>
> where constant_class is some number which is independent of the
> number of calls. It turned out that I roughly get this curve but
>
> - the leak does not exist for n <= 17
> no explanation ...
>
> - somewhere near n=130 I got another maximum
> even harder to explain than the previous result ...
>
> Optimization level for libXm and test9 was supposed to be -O1,
> perhaps I should try again with -O0.
>
> --
> Alexander Mai
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
