Alexander Mai wrote:
> Hmm, given the other reports I think we will definitly have a 0.92.even
> before christmas. While we can certainly live with some bugs in the code
> it is not a good idea to have the build/installation fail that often.
>
> (I assume you'll fix the Makefile?)
I don't think the Makefile was wrong, I suspect human error ;-)
I just performed a make dist, the result shows this :
dell: {71} zcat lesstif-0.92.5.tar.gz | tar tvf - | grep lib/Dt
drwxrwxrwx 1000/1000 0 2000-12-18 22:15:19 lesstif-0.92.5/lib/Dt/
-rw-r--r-- 1000/1000 1733 2000-12-18 21:03:20
lesstif-0.92.5/lib/Dt/Makefile.am
-rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 12205 2000-12-18 21:43:18
lesstif-0.92.5/lib/Dt/Makefile.in
-rw-r--r-- 1000/1000 4558 2000-12-13 00:49:18 lesstif-0.92.5/lib/Dt/Print.h
-rw-r--r-- 1000/1000 8662 2000-12-18 21:35:02
lesstif-0.92.5/lib/Dt/DtPrintSetupBoxP.h
-rw-r--r-- 1000/1000 49451 2000-12-18 21:35:02
lesstif-0.92.5/lib/Dt/DtPrintSetupBox.c
-rw-r--r-- 1000/1000 6000 2000-12-18 21:35:02
lesstif-0.92.5/lib/Dt/DtPrintSetupData.c
I think you may have missed a ./CVSMake or so.
Danny
--
Danny Backx ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Home page : http://users.skynet.be/danny.backx
Projects: LessTif (http://www.lesstif.org)
Oleo (http://www.gnu.org/software/oleo/oleo.html)
