On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 08:20:27PM +1100, Andrew Lister wrote: > Alexander Mai writes > >Looks like Cygwin's unistd.h is broken. > > I believe it's up to the "Cygwin experts" as to what they do and don't > include in their libc ;) > > -- > Andrew Lister Deutsche Bank, Australia Ph: +61 2 9258 2404 > -> Real programmers fit it into a single segment. Yes and no. It doesn't make sense to omit a common used API - which is a) not hard to implement (at least way easier than other things thay have in) and b) is part of UNIX95, UNIX98, SVID3, BSD 4.3, POSIX.1, ... Actually if something is inside all of those but missing in a libc one should not speak a un*x emulating/porting API. -- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
