They are all in the printing of arg lists. All this means is that the debug
code does not have a converter for whatever the resource is to String. The only
ones that _are_ implemented are the ones that someone has needed to track
through the debug code.

> While attempting to find a problem in my program using DEBUGSOURCES=all
> (thanks for mentioning that Rick) I was noting a lot (1894) of "(not
> handled FIX ME)" markers and left me thinking "am I really using that much
> 'out there stuff'?".
> 
> This is only a small nit but I was wondering what the criteria for changing
> some of the following markers to "it works"?
> 
> thor:path$ DEBUGSOURCES=all ./app_gui -sync >& lt926run.log6
> thor:path$ grep "FIX ME" lt926run.log6|sort -k 3,3 |uniq -f1 
> Arg[0] : adjustLast (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[0] : background (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[15] : borderWidth (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[7] : bottomShadowColor (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[13] : cursorPositionVisible (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[2] : deleteResponse (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[2] : entryAlignment (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[2] : font (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[11] : fontList (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[0] : foreground (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[4] : iconName (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[0] : iconPixmap (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[0] : labelType (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[2] : mappedWhenManaged (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[8] : mwmDecorations (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[0] : mwmInputMode (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[0] : orientation (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[4] : packing (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[6] : separatorType (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[0] : title (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[8] : topShadowColor (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[0] : transientFor (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[2] : translations (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[1] : unitType (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[10] : value (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[1] : windowGroup (not handled FIX ME)
> Arg[11] : wordWrap (not handled FIX ME)
> 
> lesstif version 92.6
> 
> many of these come from XtVaSetValues calls.
> 
> Some of the stuff has looked to me like it worked correctly like XmNtitle,
> XmNiconName, and XmNiconPixmap.  Others like XmNwordWrap have been
> questionable.
> 
> Or have tests proven that all of these are still Unstable?
> 
> -- 
> Todd Denniston, Code 6067, NSWC Crane
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual
> This++' and 'Integrated Development That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb. 
> Thank you.         -- Vance Petree, Virginia Power

Reply via email to