>>>>> On Sun, 18 Mar 2001 18:15:41 +0100 (CET), "Alexander Mai" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Alexander> On 16 Mar 2001 13:43:22 +0100, Danny Backx wrote: >> VendorShell. However in the case of the wrong linking order this >> doesn't help because Xt also contains a VendorShell which overrules >> the Xm VendorShell when the linkage is wrong. >> >> Could another option be the class_initialize method for XmPrimitive >> and/or XmManager ? And also XmGadget? Alexander> Is it possible to repair a wrong linking order along the lines of Alexander> _LtXmFixupVendorShell()? (so far an OS/2-only interface which Alexander> a predecessor of mine implemented) Unlikely, I suspect. With the wrong linking order, all of Lesstif's references to VendorShell symbols will point to Xt, which is harder to fix than the OS/2 problem where Xt's 2 references were wrong. __Martin
