On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 05:31:27PM -0500, Rick Scott wrote:
> >
> > This way I noticed that our leak checks for specific widgets
> > are too simple: we should not only create them, but Realize the
> > whole stuff?!
>
> This is true. But if we can't pass a create/destroy without the realize, there
> is no way we are going to pass _with_ a realize. I have also noticed a couple
> of "leaks" with OM that seem to come from the underlying XIM stuff.
[...]
Well, as reported those simple tests are meanwhile (almost?) all
fine here. So one should probably just add an enhanced version now?
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
