On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:15:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Bugs item #415669, was updated on 2001-04-12 07:25 >Summary: Xm/XpmP.h in examples/draw/draw.c > >Initial Comment: >The condition in that file: > >#if XmVERSION >= 2 ># include <Xm/XpmP.h> >... > >should be replaced by > >#if XmVersion >= 2001 ># include <Xm/XpmP.h> >... > >(XpmP.h was added in Motif-2.1 AFAIK). > >Regards, > >Evgeny > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>Comment By: Evgeny Stambulchik (evgeny) >Date: 2001-04-12 09:15 > >Message: >Logged In: YES >user_id=27019 > >Related: Lesstif shouldn't install XpmP.h in the 2.0 include >tree, only in 2.1. [...] Well, yes ... A bit of work, and not sure what's it worth ... Our 2.0 version is - since Motif 2.0 is gone - a dead end. What we're working on is 2.1. However it still sounds likely that this efforts will sometime in the future break binary compatibility with the existing 2.1 tree. Therefore the idea is/was to use our 2.0 tree for now. If 2.1 would be "stable" one could finally switch. However I'm still in favour of _not mixing_ versions and guess we really should clean up things. I would have to adjust the headers. What about lib/Xm-2.0/Xpm.c ? --- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
