Alexander Mai wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 10:43:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>>We decided to have a default version which is the only
>>>one built and which gets installed.
>>>
>>So is it always 2.0? Or is it different on different platforms/machines
>>depending on what it finds (or thinks it finds)?
>>
>
> No, hardcoded default.
> Idea to select 2.0 is that missing stuff within our 2.1 tree
> may require some binary incompatible changes in future ...
>
> [...]
>
>>Still, it would be nice if it compiled "out of the box" on OS X.
>>After all, it's so close!
>>
>
> You can be sure that this is causing headaches for us.
> But so far there's no simple solution in sight :-(
>
> The auto* authors are really challenging their users ...
>
>
What is the problems with the new auto*-tools ?. I have autoconf 2.52,
automake 1.4j and libtool 1.4b installed. After download of
Lesstif-0.93.0 i tried the new tools on the lesstifs build-system. After
some minor tweaks it seems to compile as it should.
Karsten Jensen
