I still fail to see why we need to branch. There's not enough people
using the CVS version to make this an issue, or at least that's my
opinion.
Others, please express your opinions !
Alexander: exactly what is wrong with the newest versions of the
auto tools for you ? With which versions and on which platforms ?
Danny
Alexander Mai wrote:
>
> Hmm, just got the idea that we could have a branch in CVS for
> trying a new setup:
>
> - volunteers could try latest auto* stuff (fails for me anyway)
> - testbed for new installation
> (today someone told me something about "ldconfig/linux doesn't honor
> symlinks and such things; didn't realize fully but it seems to be
> related to our installation scheme?)
> We have to abandon the current system, even an advanced shell script on our own
> to create the proper links for "non-linux-like" systems won't work out probably.
> So to sum up: how would it look like if we install all versions of libXm
> directly in the $(prefix)/lib ?!
>
> The other question is how to achieve this easily. The point is
> I'd like to have different Makefile.am's but the same sources, of course.
> Can this be done?
--
Danny Backx ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Home page : http://users.skynet.be/danny.backx
Projects: LessTif (http://www.lesstif.org)
Oleo (http://www.gnu.org/software/oleo/oleo.html)
