Sounds like we would need to maintain the right order of directories
in the SUBDIR line in lib/ and include/ and things should just work.
Does anyone object to my making this change ?
Danny
Rick Scott wrote:
> Very simple. If you want/need both versions, cd lesstif, mkdir 1.2, cd 1.2,
> ../configure --enable-default-1.2, make install, cd .., mkdir 2.0, cd 2.0,
> ../configure --enable-default-2.0, make install. At this point 1.2 has been
> installed for any legacy apps that you have installed, and 2.0 is the default
> that new apps are compiled against. On all platforms that I can think of,
> libXm.so.1.2 and libXm.so.2.0 can survive together, with new apps being linked
> against libXm.so, whatever that is symlinked to, which in the above case would
> be libXm.so.2.0. Installing libXm.2.0 after libXm.so.1.2 will not get rid of
> libXm.1.2, simply override libXm.so. Now what to have as our default version is
> much more of a question. If the Xm.h that ends up installed claims to be 1.2,
> we have damn near all of the functionality. However if it ends up as 2.0, or
> 2.1, then we are not as complete. We will _never_ have 2.0 compatibility, 2.1
> we have a chance at.
--
Danny Backx ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Home page : http://users.skynet.be/danny.backx
Projects: LessTif (http://www.lesstif.org)
Oleo (http://www.gnu.org/software/oleo/oleo.html)
