On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 12:53:38 -0800, Robert Pearson wrote: >> Ok, that means that LessTif is not linked (=used) by >> that application. The problem is something different, sorry. > >I think it's statically link: that is, I think the programmer >put the libraries into the executable so that the user would >not have to have the Lesstif libraries install, but instead the >executable would have all the resources. > >Does this sound possible?
Possible, but not very likely. Since LessTif was LGPL'ed all the time distributing or demanding installation of the libraries is/was in general the preferred method. >This program was created in late 1997 using Lesstif....can I assume >that there are some issues having it run with current Lesstif and with >Redhat 7.2? > >Perhaps the functionality should be taken out of it and it should be >reprogrammed with a new resource library for X? > >thanks for your help. If the source still exists re-building is certainly a worthwhile option. Note that many binary compatibility issues are also known on linux. --- Alexander Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Lesstif mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://terror.hungry.com/mailman/listinfo/lesstif
