On Sat, 11 May 2002 09:53:41 -0500, Bruce P wrote:

>How about if you or some one in your exaulted group took 2 secs. to actually try
>my applications?
>A far as I know,  there is no single solitary other program that does what my
>program does, or
>pushes the use and need for your product.  You could be a little more receptive,
>even maybe
>enthusiastic?
>
>if that is to much to ask, well, it just shows Lessitf is doomed and I wil move
>on to another more
>pertinant technogy.
>
>[[[[[[]]]]]]]]]]
>
>Danny Backx wrote:

Seems the public missed some of your communication??

The general discussion about Motif, it's position in the
"business market", etc. is misplaced here. People here do care
about that technology, or at least want or have to use it.

It's nice to see new products, and we do spend time to keep
our ist of Motif/LessTif applications the most comprehensive
around. In fact those lists on sites like www.motif*.* usually
just copy our list %-\  (while we not only get information from
people like you, but I also spent time with search engines
looking around...)

There's no reason to be disappointed if there's no huge 
response on an announcement. People reading this list
include plain users and developers which may already use
other similar tools (those which cost $$). Not to mention
that a real useful feedback would demand some time...


And here's one tiny report:
you may want to change the variable/field name "class" in various
locations to something different. "class" is a reserved keyword
and renaming this would (perhaps, not fully tested) allow to
even use a C++ compiler (I did by mistake ;-)
And add some #include <Xm/Text.h> for TextObject.c perhaps.

Bye,


---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
Lesstif mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://terror.hungry.com/mailman/listinfo/lesstif

Reply via email to