[The original message didn't make it to the list, spam volume is too
 high for the old approach and the friendly people at hungry.com are
 setting up a new spam approach.]

John,

Just letting you know that your message isn't lost.

        Danny

> Please CC me on any reply as I'm not subscribed - thanks.
>
> Also please note I've left loads of "Xm"s off names below.
>
> There is a discrepancy between Motif and Lesstif (rel 0.93.36) over the 
> "position" value in SpinBoxes which is apparent if the child type is 
> numeric and the "minimumValue" is non-zero.
>
> With "positionType" set to POSITION_VALUE (the default) the value 
> displayed is "minimumValue + position" on LessTif and just "position" on 
> Motif.
>
> The description on O'Reilly 6B p968 in my copy is a little ambiguous but 
> it seems to me that the Motif version is correct and LessTif is behaving 
> like Motif would do with "positionType" set to POSITION_INDEX (which 
> makes no difference with LessTif).
>
> -- 
> John Collins Xi Software Ltd www.xisl.com


_______________________________________________
Lesstif mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://terror.hungry.com/mailman/listinfo/lesstif

Reply via email to