The ** is really "mi" to avoid list rejection..
If this list is active...  I seem to have been purged from it.

The admin application crashes if you try to set a "long" string as a rejection string. Where "long" is not very long and seems to be about 64 characters.

I have set up a series of scripts to copy the daily digest to a server, parse it into individual messages and then set up a search engine. In updating this, I put in a test to make sure I was getting the "right" number of messages out of each digest.

Of course this turned up that a log of folks use the digest split strings of 72 dashes in their sig file. Also and even worse is that people have quoted the entire digest when replying to the list. This makes parsing a pain.

So I decided to ban the digest message separator string in the body of a message.
That would be:

"----------------------------------------------------------------------"
(this is in quotes so it doesn't mess up digests either)

So I went to server rejection strings, pasted in the above string and boom the admin crashed. If I start typing in dashes by hand instead of pasting, I can put in about 64 dashes before it crashes.

Is this a problem deep in the admin/server systems or is it a simple change of a #define to handle more than 64 character strings? Can we hope for a 4.0.9a?

Also two nigiling little "features" that might be trivial (I hope) to change. The digests come with "dos" line endings which are a bit of a pain to deal with. This is not too hard to filter through a simple perl script, but skiping that step would be more OS X/unix like and allow tools to work better (ie grep, sed etc.).

The other is to change the digest naming scheme when they are named by "date". Instead of <Name> Digest MM-DD-YY a better format would be <Name> Digest YYYY-MM-DD. Sorting and processing would be much easier, and I do have digests back to the last century.

-Scott
--
This message is from the Letterrip-Talk Mailing list.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/letterrip-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/

Reply via email to