Author: manuel
Date: 2005-06-03 11:48:26 -0600 (Fri, 03 Jun 2005)
New Revision: 5625

Modified:
   branches/cross-lfs/BOOK/final-preps/abouttestsuites.xml
Log:
Indented final-preps/abouttestsuites.xml

Modified: branches/cross-lfs/BOOK/final-preps/abouttestsuites.xml
===================================================================
--- branches/cross-lfs/BOOK/final-preps/abouttestsuites.xml     2005-06-03 
17:34:05 UTC (rev 5624)
+++ branches/cross-lfs/BOOK/final-preps/abouttestsuites.xml     2005-06-03 
17:48:26 UTC (rev 5625)
@@ -1,50 +1,54 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
-<!DOCTYPE sect1 PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN" 
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd"; [
+<!DOCTYPE sect1 PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN"
+  "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd"; [
   <!ENTITY % general-entities SYSTEM "../general.ent">
   %general-entities;
 ]>
+
 <sect1 id="ch-final-preps-abouttestsuites">
-<title>About the Test Suites</title>
-<?dbhtml filename="abouttestsuites.html"?>
+  <?dbhtml filename="abouttestsuites.html"?>
 
-<para>Most packages provide a test suite. Running the test suite for a
-newly built package is a good idea because it can provide a <quote>sanity
-check</quote> indicating that everything compiled correctly. A test suite
-that passes its set of checks usually proves that the package is
-functioning as the developer intended. It does not, however, guarantee
-that the package is totally bug free.</para>
+  <title>About the Test Suites</title>
 
-<para>Some test suites are more important than others. For example,
-the test suites for the core toolchain packages&mdash;GCC, Binutils, and
-Glibc&mdash;are of the utmost importance due to their central role in a
-properly functioning system. The test suites for GCC and Glibc can
-take a very long time to complete, especially on slower hardware, but
-are strongly recommended.</para>
+  <para>Most packages provide a test suite. Running the test suite for a
+  newly built package is a good idea because it can provide a <quote>sanity
+  check</quote> indicating that everything compiled correctly. A test suite
+  that passes its set of checks usually proves that the package is
+  functioning as the developer intended. It does not, however, guarantee
+  that the package is totally bug free.</para>
 
-<note><para>Experience has shown that there is little to be gained
-from running the test suites in <xref
-linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/>. There can be no escaping the fact
-that the host system always exerts some influence on the tests in that
-chapter, often causing inexplicable failures. Because the tools built
-in <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> are temporary and
-eventually discarded, we do not recommend running the test suites in
-<xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> for the average reader. The
-instructions for running those test suites are provided for the
-benefit of testers and developers, but they are strictly
-optional.</para></note>
+  <para>Some test suites are more important than others. For example,
+  the test suites for the core toolchain packages&mdash;GCC, Binutils, and
+  Glibc&mdash;are of the utmost importance due to their central role in a
+  properly functioning system. The test suites for GCC and Glibc can
+  take a very long time to complete, especially on slower hardware, but
+  are strongly recommended.</para>
 
-<para>A common issue with running the test suites for Binutils and GCC
-is running out of pseudo terminals (PTYs). This can result in a high
-number of failing tests. This may happen for several reasons, but the
-most likely cause is that the host system does not have the
-<systemitem class="filesystem">devpts</systemitem> file system set up 
-correctly. This issue is discussed in greater detail in <xref
-linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/>.</para>
+  <note>
+    <para>Experience has shown that there is little to be gained
+    from running the test suites in <xref
+    linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/>. There can be no escaping the fact
+    that the host system always exerts some influence on the tests in that
+    chapter, often causing inexplicable failures. Because the tools built
+    in <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> are temporary and
+    eventually discarded, we do not recommend running the test suites in
+    <xref linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/> for the average reader. The
+    instructions for running those test suites are provided for the
+    benefit of testers and developers, but they are strictly
+    optional.</para>
+  </note>
 
-<para>Sometimes package test suites will give false failures. Consult
-the LFS Wiki at <ulink url="&wiki-root;"/> to verify that these
-failures are expected. This site is valid for all tests throughout this
-book.</para>
+  <para>A common issue with running the test suites for Binutils and GCC
+  is running out of pseudo terminals (PTYs). This can result in a high
+  number of failing tests. This may happen for several reasons, but the
+  most likely cause is that the host system does not have the
+  <systemitem class="filesystem">devpts</systemitem> file system set up
+  correctly. This issue is discussed in greater detail in <xref
+  linkend="chapter-temporary-tools"/>.</para>
 
+  <para>Sometimes package test suites will give false failures. Consult
+  the LFS Wiki at <ulink url="&wiki-root;"/> to verify that these
+  failures are expected. This site is valid for all tests throughout this
+  book.</para>
+
 </sect1>
-

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to