http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1529

           Summary: Section 6.22.1 nitpick
           Product: Linux From Scratch
           Version: TESTING
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: trivial
          Priority: P5
         Component: Book
        AssignedTo: [email protected]
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
         QAContact: [email protected]


Noted:

"Next we will remove the old, .so files in /lib"

As stated in an earlier bug, is the word "old" really necessary?

Also, whether or not "old" is removed, the comma after it should be
removed for sure.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to