http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1529
Summary: Section 6.22.1 nitpick
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: TESTING
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P5
Component: Book
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QAContact: [email protected]
Noted:
"Next we will remove the old, .so files in /lib"
As stated in an earlier bug, is the word "old" really necessary?
Also, whether or not "old" is removed, the comma after it should be
removed for sure.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page