http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1576
Summary: /etc/inputrc text a bit long-winded?
Product: Linux From Scratch
Version: TESTING
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Book
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QAContact: [email protected]
This page seems overly pedantic. Perhaps assuming /etc/inputrc and just
mentioning ~/.inputrc in passing would be more in line with standard assumptions
about the user's level of knowledge? Also, the book doesn't create /etc/skel.
BLFS has a fine page for that at:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/skel.html
Should we remove reference to /etc/skel?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
