Steve Crosby wrote:
What we need is an errata system for stable releases, so we can add such information after a release is made. One of the issues that will need to be discussed if an errata mechanism is followed is how far back errata will be tracked (i.e. do we provide errata for much older releases, i.e. LFS 5.0) - I would suggest we only provide errata for the current stable release, and have a section in the LFS book (perhaps at the end) describing the changing software world, and perhaps recommending some resources the user can access to track security and functionality issues.
+1 -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
