El Jueves, 23 de Junio de 2005 19:40, Jeremy Huntwork escribió: > Archaic wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:27:04AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Removed unneeded <application> tags. > > > > Manuel, I went and did this because it also affected the inputrc page > > which I was working (and I had a few minutes to spare). :) > > > > I will wait until inputrc is merged before merging this.
Thanks :-) Removing that from my TODO list. > I haven't looked at it at all, just wondering... Are we doing anything > then to distinguish application names? Or is it felt that that's > unnecessary? I think that <application> tags are unnecessary for LFS due that all application names are capitalized, and isn't semantically correct for some packages (like Iana-etc, for example). If a different look is wanted for application names, we can to add that tags on all needed places and to create the needed CSS code, but after 6.1 release, please ;-) -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
