On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 09:17:03PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >New Revision: 6249 > > >+<para>Various file systems exported by the kernel are used to communicate > >to and > >+from the kernel itself. These file systems are virtual in that no disk > >space is > >+used for them. The contents of the file systems resides in memory.</para> > > s/resides/reside/
I'd rather s/contents/content since the collective content as a whole is being referred to. Opinions? > >+<para>The created groups are not part of any standard—they are some > >of the > >+groups that the Udev configuration will use in the next section. > > Sorry for not spotting this before, but is it really only 'some' of the > groups that Udev needs? Surely we should be creating all of the groups > that Udev needs, or it'll be broken? Worse. There are more groups then udev needs (at least for LFS's purpose). How about: The created groups are not part of any standard—they are groups decided on in part by the requirements of Udev configuration in the next section. That's really the best explanation I can think of. The other groups don't belong, but that change won't happen until after 6.1. > >+well-written packages do not depend on GID numbers, but rather use the > >group's > > s/packages/programs/ I'm ambivalent on this one. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
