Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/21/05 13:13 CST: > The command was in a <para> construct, not the normal <screen> > constructs we use for commands.
I forgot about that. Yes, you are correct. Probably not worth a changelog entry now that you point out that scripts using the && wouldn't have worked anyway. Thanks for the cluebat. :-) -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 13:12:01 up 141 days, 12:45, 3 users, load average: 1.02, 0.95, 0.62 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
