On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 01:56:32AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > ([sigh]... why can't just folks sometimes admit that they didn't > understand the original statement, and instead want to make > excuses for why they felt their suggestion was valid?)
Now I'm lost. I understood quite well what Justin was saying. It had nothing to do with updating anduin. He offered to point to lfs-matrix. The discussion of anduin being updated is, in this case, the irrelevant part of the discussion. If anduin isn't updated, then pointing to anduin is useless, same with lfs-matrix. However, if anduin is up to date, then so is matrix. The problem being solved was not the updating of anduin, but Bruce's initial suggestion to point to anduin which is still just as practical as pointing to the original site because the link is only good for a day or two anyway at the original site. So I don't know if you were aiming the above paragraph at Justin, but it seems more rightly applicable to you. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
