http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1662
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-27 09:24 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > "It is also important to note that using a journalling filesystem does not > entirely obsolete the use of filesystem checking programs (fsck). Hardware and > software errors that corrupt random blocks in the filesystem are not generally > recoverable with the transaction log." - > http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue68/dellomodarme.html > > Therefore, it would seem sensible to just remove that paragraph from the book. (In reply to comment #1) > "It is also important to note that using a journalling filesystem does not > entirely obsolete the use of filesystem checking programs (fsck). Hardware and > software errors that corrupt random blocks in the filesystem are not generally > recoverable with the transaction log." - > http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue68/dellomodarme.html > > Therefore, it would seem sensible to just remove that paragraph from the book. I agree. Since LFS only deals with ext2 and BLFS deals with all the other options, it is probably best to stick to only ext2 in the LFS book. But LFS can refer readers to the BLFS book for other filesystems like ext3, reiserfs etc. Rob ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
