Matthew Burgess wrote:
Hmmm, what's with this apparent convention of changing the date in its own revision? I thought it was supposed to get changed along with a Real Change TM?
I noticed this, too. But he followed it with a Real Change, so not a big deal, right? Except, of course, a wasted revision.
-- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
