#1765: Update to LFS License -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner: [email protected] Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.2 Component: Book | Version: SVN Severity: normal | Resolution: Keywords: | -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Comment (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Bruce, the way you phrased the summary has left me a little unclear. To me, the construction of your sentences don't seem to flow logically, so I'm left guessing a bit as to what you mean. Can you perhaps clarify and/or extend it with more details? For example, your first sentence, reads to me as: "Despite the fact that the ''LFS'' license is pretty open, I tried to get the LDP to accept the ''BLFS'' license and they didn't approve of it." And your second sentence reads to me as: "To fix the issue where the LDP won't accept ''BLFS'' because of its license, I suggest that LFS use the same type of license that BLFS uses." I'm really not trying to nitpick, I'm just afraid I don't understand. -- Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1765> LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/> Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
