[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 04/13/06 12:42 CST: > + <para>Also, if you would prefer to skip Berkeley DB entirely > + and use GDBM instead, see the BLFS instructions located at > + <ulink url="&blfs-root;view/svn/general/gdbm.html"/></para>
Just an FYI, but this has a *very* negative effect on BLFS where we assume that BDB is installed. Giving users the choice of which DB to install effectively makes BDB an optional package now in LFS, but the BLFS packages have all removed the BDB dependencies (even the required ones), rendering the build instructions *wrong* if a user elected to follow the LFS book and not install BDB. Shouldn't this have been discussed first? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:45:00 up 19 days, 22 min, 2 users, load average: 0.04, 0.07, 0.05 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
