#1728: Chapter 6 - Package Management - Explain why 'install' is generally safer
than 'cp'
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
 Reporter:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |        Owner:  [email protected]
     Type:  enhancement                  |       Status:  closed                
       
 Priority:  normal                       |    Milestone:  Future                
       
Component:  Book                         |      Version:  SVN                   
       
 Severity:  normal                       |   Resolution:  fixed                 
       
 Keywords:                               |  
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Comment (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 Based on practical experience, install *is* safer than cp. Let me explain
 the problem that I ran into. I had started KDE. qt was installed in /usr.
 I was recompiling Qt in an xterm. The Qt Makefiles use cp instead of
 install. During installation, the qt libraries were replaced by the new
 versions which caused my KDE session to abort. When I replaced the cp in
 the Makefiles by install, everything was ok.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1728>
LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to