El Miércoles, 2 de Agosto de 2006 15:42, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> On 8/1/06, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To me, it seems that when building the SVN books, you would not want
> to skip failures. This would help tremendously if jhalfs bombed on
> testsuite errors for development. We could identify testsuite issues a
> lot faster.
Removing "-k || true" and building 6.2, the first bomb has been in
035-dejagnu:
=== tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix
Running target unix
Using /mnt/build_dir/sources/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/../config/base-config.exp
as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Using /mnt/build_dir/sources/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/config/default.exp as
tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running /mnt/build_dir/sources/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/libdejagnu/tunit.exp ...
FAIL: Pass message
FAIL: Fail message
Running /mnt/build_dir/sources/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/runtest.all/libs.exp ...
Running /mnt/build_dir/sources/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/runtest.all/options.exp
...
Running
/mnt/build_dir/sources/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/runtest.all/stats-sub.exp ...
Running /mnt/build_dir/sources/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/runtest.all/stats.exp ...
=== Summary ===
# of expected passes 59
# of unexpected failures 2
That failures are in my logs from many time ago.
I will to add a configuration switch for jhalfs-1.1 (to be released when
CLFS-1.0) to can select if jhalfs should to bomb in testsuites failures or
not.
But that meant that when "bomb in testsuites" will be activated, it will bomb
also in know failed testsites like the Glibc one, except if the "-k" switch
and the "|| true" by-pass are added to the book commands for that packages.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
