BLFS Trac wrote: > #2173: Lua-5.1.1 > -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- > Reporter: Luca | Owner: [email protected] > Type: enhancement | Status: new > Priority: normal | Milestone: future > Component: BOOK | Version: SVN > Severity: normal | Resolution: > Keywords: | > -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- > Changes (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > * milestone: 6.2 => future > > Comment: > > What other package is there than can link to the shared LUA libraries? > Why do the shared libraries need to be installed? > > My feeling is that patches that link optional package into the build > can be mentioned on a Wiki page, but are not appropriate for a BLFS > page. Instead, on a BLFS page, there should just be a mention on how > to modify the build to link these optional packages. > > Changing the Milestone to future instead of 6.2. Discussion is > required before this package is added into BLFS, simply due to its > small user base. Would a Wiki page suit this package better? > > It could be that a wiki page could be more appropriate, so it could be for all the optional dependencies of kde-packages and other. However I tracked down all the build instructions for all the recomended and optional requirements for each package in blfs-book. It took a month or plus, I don't remember, and a lot of paper and ink...
Luca -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
