On 2/15/07, LFS Trac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm marking this as invalid as it doesn't affect svn trunk. The > problematic 'echo' statement that Ken pointed to is already a 'printf' in > glibc-2.5, which fixes things up nicely (I didn't have the sources to hand > when I went on my POSIX crusade earlier on!).
We should probably still dust off the old website and add it to the Errata. I think I'll start a thread on -dev to see if there are other Errata fixes needed for 6.2. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
