#1993: Linux-2.6.21
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
 Reporter:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |        Owner:  [email protected]
     Type:  enhancement                   |       Status:  new                  
        
 Priority:  normal                        |    Milestone:  Future               
        
Component:  Book                          |      Version:  SVN                  
        
 Severity:  normal                        |   Resolution:                       
        
 Keywords:                                |  
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Comment (by Bryan Kadzban):

 While that may be true, udev-109 (see #1992) logs an error with kernels
 older than 2.6.21 when it tries to run ata_id on libata disks.  (See
 [http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug-devel&m=117768109612881&w=2].)

 I see a few different options:

 1) Stay with udev-108 until either the patch is applied and a new version
 is released, or forever in the stable book (would depend on when the
 stable book gets frozen, and when (and whether) the patch gets applied to
 udev).

 2) Upgrade to udev-109 and apply the patch ourselves (until it gets
 applied upstream -- if it gets applied upstream -- and we upgrade to
 whatever version has it).

 3) Upgrade the kernel.

 Neither 1) nor 2) will give us compatibility symlinks (so I believe the
 comment in the book sources saying that "by-id will even survive the
 transition to libata" would be incorrect, though I'm not sure).  Plus I'm
 not sure why 2.6.21 won't receive long-term bugfixes; isn't it the new
 stable kernel?  (I have no idea whether it is or not; all I know is the
 past behavior of the kernel -stable people w.r.t. releases.  Maybe that's
 going to change this time around.)

 OTOH, it could perhaps be argued that libata is way beyond LFS -- at
 least, until it becomes the default in the kernel configuration.  (If it
 becomes the default.  I'm guessing it'll get a lot more testing before
 they do that.)

 Of course, I'd agree that we should skip 2.6.21 if we want to get 6.3 out
 the door "soon" (depending on what exactly "soon" means).  And udev-109
 may not really be required either; the only changes that sound like they
 would be good to have are the ones that fix bugs ("create_path: don't fail
 if something else created the directory" and "udevd: fix serialization of
 events").

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1993#comment:2>
LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to