#2133: Coreutils-6.10 ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner: [email protected] Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0 Component: Book | Version: SVN Severity: normal | Resolution: Keywords: | ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Comment (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Replying to [comment:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Replying to [comment:9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > No arguments that util-linux-ng would be the proper place, but google knows nothing about any intention to put hostname.c there. > > Thread starts at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug- coreutils/2007-07/msg00154.html and continues at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-08/msg00112.html. > > Doesn't look like anything ever got committed in util-linux-ng upstream though. I'll chase them up later on today. Thanks for the links. In the meantime, and subject to a complete build actually working, I'd like to see 6.10 in the book. How about adding the following version of hostname ''at the end of procps, which is where sysctl is installed'' ? {{{ cat >/bin/hostname <<EOF #!/bin/sh if [ \$# -gt 0 ]; then sysctl -q -w kernel.hostname=\$1 else uname -n fi EOF chmod -m 0755 /bin/hostname }}} I need to do more testing on the coreutils build before I start a full system build, I had some odd errors yesterday (e.g. invocation of autotools, which failed at the lzma identifier), and it appeared to not install arch even though I had not mentioned it in my override of --enable-no-install-program. -- Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2133#comment:11> LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/> Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
