> I put 22310 and 2315 in 6.4 because I thought they were errata for 6.4. > Either > milestone it probably OK.
Right. Errate. Those slipped my mind, sorry. That means any number of bugs need to be re-evaluated for errata status. Some of those items in the tickets "Several issues in current stable LFS book. Part X" aren't appropriate for the Errata page. Some would be good candidates like Ticket #2315 (Part 3) that mentions a sed issue. We'll be better served splitting ticket #2310 (part 1) and #2315 (part 3) into new tickets that properly categorize them once we decide what is errata material and what isn't. Gerard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
