#2437: chap-5.10.1 gcc unneeded reference to sysv4.h
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  gespinasse   |       Owner:  lfs-b...@…                   
     Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  new                          
 Priority:  normal       |   Milestone:  6.5                          
Component:  Book         |     Version:  SVN                          
 Severity:  minor        |    Keywords:                               
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by br...@…):

 Replying to [ticket:2437 gespinasse]:
 > gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h contain the define for the linker
 > GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER "/lib/ld.so.1"
 > But gcc/config/i386/sysv4.h does not contain that define.

 Um... so?  :-)

 > LFS does not support powerpc, so that's useless to adjust the linker in
 rs6000/sysv4.h file.

 Oh, I see.

 This was the result of making the book a bit friendlier to other
 architectures a while ago, when it didn't overly complicate things.  (This
 is also why the text in the "toolchain technical notes" section is not
 specific to the x86 32-bit linker, but is generic when that's easy.)

 I would rather not change this back to be x86/32-bit specific.  It's not
 very complicated the way it is, and we hit all the possible linker paths
 this way.  No, the book doesn't *support* other architectures, but it
 might possibly *work* on some of them this way.  It's up to the reader to
 ensure that it does (since we don't), but there's at least a chance.

 (Same with the multilib comment.)

 I won't set this to WONTFIX yet, though (I'll let a few other people chime
 in; maybe everybody else wants to revert to x86-and-32-bit-only).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2437#comment:1>
LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to