Test Man wrote: > Can I ask how you performed your test - i.e. was it built from a i386 > LFS 5.0 image?
No it was from an LFS-6.5 image. > If not, would you be able to test this or could someone else who has > access to an i386 LFS 5.0 image to confirm my observations? Sorry, I don't think I'm interested in checking for compatibility with a system published in June 2004 on hardware that that is even older. We may have a non-compatibility in the host system requirements in that we need to raise the minimum level of packages, but I'm not going to put any time in it. The main culprit is probably glibc. 5.0 used 2.3.2 and we are now at 2.11.1. See if you can boot from a commercial distro and use that as the base host. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
