#2941: libpipeline documentation wrongly claims that it does not have a test
suite
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: cjwatson | Owner: bdubbs@…
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0
Component: Book | Version: SVN
Severity: normal | Keywords:
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by bdubbs@…):
Replying to [comment:5 matthew@…]:
> That sounds reasonable for now. I wish there was 'one true' automated
testing software, because now it looks as if we need 'expect', 'dejagnu',
'autotest' and 'check' to get full test coverage in LFS.
Matt, I'm glad you brought up 'expect' and 'dejagnu'. There is also
'tcl'. We build those as a part of the testing tools in Chapter 5. I'm
not opposed to adding 'check' to Chapter 5 (and BLFS) and adding the
commands needed to run the libpipeline checks in Chapter 6.
--
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2941#comment:9>
LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
