On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 16:30 +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:12:04AM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > > > +<!ENTITY libnl-version "2.0"> > > +<!ENTITY libnl-size "650 KB"> > > +<!ENTITY libnl-url > > "http://www.infradead.org/~tgr/libnl/files/libnl-&libnl-version;.tar.gz";> > > +<!ENTITY libnl-md5 "6aaf1e9802a17a7d702bb0638044ffa7"> > > +<!ENTITY libnl-home "http://www.infradead.org/~tgr/libnl/";> > > +<!ENTITY libnl-ch6-du "22.0 MB"> > > +<!ENTITY libnl-ch6-sbu "0.1 SBU"> > > Ouch! I was watching this with interest (I need libnl to > build-test NetworkManager for gnome-3: havn't quite got there yet), > and when you mentioned a newer version I downloaded libnl-3.2.3. > > Perhaps 2.0 is indeed better (it appears not to have created static > libs for you, which is nice - I had to pass --enable-static=no).
Ah, good catch. I did look for the static libs but didn't see them immediately. Fixed in r9706. Incidentally, is there a similar trick for preventing those pesky libtool archives (.la) from being built/installed? Are they actually useful on a Linux box? Thanks, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
