#4463: gcc-9.1.0
--------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: bdubbs | Owner: lfs-book
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.5
Component: Book | Version: SVN
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------+-----------------------
Comment (by bdubbs):
In the LFS Chapter 6 environment, I get the following failures:
{{{
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/wrapped_env.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/wrapped_locale.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/wrapped_env.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/wrapped_locale.cc execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr57193.c scan-assembler-times movdqa 2
FAIL: experimental/net/internet/resolver/ops/lookup.cc execution test
FAIL: experimental/net/internet/resolver/ops/reverse.cc execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr90178.c scan-assembler-times xorl[\\t
]*\\%eax,[\\t ]*%eax 1
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 139167
# of unexpected failures 2
# of expected failures 527
# of unsupported tests 2151
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 134426
# of expected failures 527
# of unsupported tests 5875
=== libatomic Summary ===
# of expected passes 54
=== libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes 2312
# of expected failures 2
# of unsupported tests 210
=== libitm Summary ===
# of expected passes 42
# of expected failures 3
# of unsupported tests 1
}}}
I guess that 10 failures out of over 280,000+ tests is not too bad.
I'll do a build in the BLFS environment and compare.
--
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/4463#comment:1>
LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
