On Monday 25 April 2005 14:57, Ken Moffat wrote:

>  As to performance, I haven't done any benchmarking.  Unless the nptl
> performance is bad (and I see no evidence of that),  I can't see any
> reason to revert to linuxthreads where nptl is available.

It's not quite a benchmark, but when I converted my LFS-5.1 to nptl 
threads (according to the hint then) I was also busy on a program 
simulating ising model variants on a lattice. nptl sped up the 
execution time between a factor of 3 and 5. I was very much impressed 
although I must add that my experience with programming threads was 
about zilch at the time so it could also have been down to better 
handling of my cumbersome code.

Regards,
Allard.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-chat
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to