Kenno Han wrote: > > There are hints available on busybox and uclibc. I think you should check > that out. >
Thanks. Will do. I've also been looking into musl ( http://www.musl-libc.org/ ). Seems pretty nice. I've built some programs with uclibc in the past and have recently been trying out musl for building applications. Not sure how well musl supports C++, but for C programs, so far, programs seem to need less patches to build than they did with ulibc. Still need patches for both though. They don't always have exactly the same functionality and syntax as glibc or eglibc. Sincerely, Laura http://www.distasis.com/cpp
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-chat FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
