On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Barius Drubeck <[email protected]> wrote:
> On your switch from patching to packaging you lost me, however. All I was trying to say is that in the case of some software that doesn't compile against the latest versions of the toolchain and other dependencies, my first choice would be to avoid shipping it as part of the distribution. I was just giving mozjs-17.0.0 and openjade as two examples of packages that are in BLFS, but seem to be dead upstream and either don't compile or don't work without patching. -- Daniel
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-chat FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
