On 2/22/2005 18:22, Archaic wrote: > not sure if the book should recommend that or install vim in /bin in the > first place. A somewhat valid argument would be sed for emergency > purposes.
I would think having ed around would be enough. Vim is kinda large compared to the actual ex-vi package but I haven't done any actual comparisons between that and vim built with the minimal feature set. I could actually be be convinced to support a push for ex-vi to replace vim in LFS but I'm not gonna go there! ;) Still, just sed is a little extreme IMO for an emergency editor. ~Jason -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
