Jeremy Utley wrote these words on 03/09/05 00:51 CST: > I don't see why not, but IMHO, it's far easier to just build the Pass1's > dynamic instead of static - it sidesteps libc.a completely (uses libc.so > instead), and definately works - I've used that process myself when > building from jhuntwork's LFS 6 cd, which exhibits this problem. This > is also the solution we recommend to people on IRC who encounter this > problem. The end result, as far as I can tell, is exactly the same, > since the dynamic pass 1's linked against the host's glibc are > overwritten by the dynamic pass 2's linked against our new glibc.
A couple of days ago I built up SVN-20050303 using dynamic libs in Pass1 of Binutils and GCC, because the host is LFS-6.0 and exhibits the strip issue. The system seems to be fine. I've installed quite a few BLFS packages and haven't seen any problems. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 09:49:00 up 7 days, 19:53, 5 users, load average: 0.15, 0.22, 0.35 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
