So it's better to change the book to say "ISO-8859-1".
Hmm, but as Ken pointed out, 'locale -a' (which we point out on that same page) lists 'en_GB.iso88591', so I've a feeling us setting it to 'ISO-8859-1' may just confuse folks. If there's stuff out there that incorrectly expects something else, it needs reporting as a bug IMO.
So, are there any compelling reasons for us not setting it to 'en_GB.iso88591'?
Cheers,
Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
