TheOldFellow wrote these words on 04/16/05 14:12 CST: > I had no difficulty building a reasonably stable gcc-4/glibc-2.3.5 > system that carried BLFS with just a few patches all the way up to a > gnome build (with a few oddities in gnome, I admit, but that's usual > with my gnome builds) plus the Mozilla family too.
Hi Richard, I'm not trying to stir the pot, but would like you to answer one simple question for folks like me that don't know the answer, yet it is the most important of all. What advantage do you see in your "reasonably stable" system over one that builds "very stable" using existing LFS methods? -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 14:16:00 up 14 days, 13:49, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
